The Supreme
Court had on July 16 asked the Centre and the J&K Administration to
respond to a petition seeking initiation of contempt proceedings
|
New Delhi(Agencies): There
can't be an immediate resumption of 4G services in Jammu and Kashmir as a
special committee constituted to examine the issue has decided against it in
view of "prevalent situation in this sensitive region", the Centre
has told to Supreme Court.
In an affidavit filed in the
Supreme Court earlier this week, the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) said the
situation in Jammu and Kashmir would be reviewed for the next two months and if
there was an improvement, appropriate action would be taken accordingly.
On the basis of a wide-ranging
assessment of the situation in the sensitive region, the special committee,
which met on June 10, decided that “no further relaxation on internet services
including 4G services could be carried out at the present”.
The affidavit has been filed
in response to a contempt petition alleging that the government did not
constitute a special committee as directed by a Supreme Court to review
internet restrictions imposed in Jammu and Kashmir.
The Supreme Court had on July 16
asked the Centre and the J&K Administration to respond to a petition
seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against the Union Home Secretary and
Jammu and Kashmir Chief Secretary for allegedly not setting up a committee to
review curbs on the Internet in the newly formed Union Territory.
In its May 11 verdict, the top
court had directed immediate setting up of a “Special Committee” to determine
the necessity of continued restriction of mobile internet speed in J&K to
2G only. It had also asked the committee to put its decisions in the public
domain.
A Bench led by Justice NV
Ramana had asked the Centre and J&K Administration to respond to the
contempt plea by NGO Foundation for Media Professionals, which alleged that
despite the top court’s order, the said committee to assess the need for
internet restrictions in J&K had not been formed. The NGO wanted
restoration of 4G internet services to enable children to attend their schools
online.
However, terming the NGO’s
allegation as “totally misconceived and misconstrued”, the MHA affidavit said
the special committee was constituted by the Supreme Court itself on May 11,
2020, when the Justice NV Ramana-led bench had ordered that a special committee
headed by Home Secretary, Government of India, would be formed to review the
internet restrictions in the valley.
“After the May 11 order of the Supreme Court,
no further notification or order from the government was needed,” the affidavit
stated.
During the previous hearing,
Attorney General KK Venugopal had contested the allegations, saying there was
no question of contempt as the said committee had already been
constituted. “How can there be contempt
if the committee has already been put in place?” he had wondered.
While refusing to order the
restoration of 4G mobile internet services in Jammu and Kashmir, a three-judge
Bench headed by Justice NV Ramana had on May 11 set up a special committee led
by Union Home Secretary to take a call on the issue after factoring in the
security situation on the ground. Besides the Union Home Secretary, DoT
Secretary and Chief Secretary of J-K was to be on the panel.
In its May 11 order, the
Supreme Court said: “...since the issues involved affect the state and the
nation, the Review Committee (under Telecom Rules), which consists of only
state-level officers, may not be in a position to satisfactorily address all
issues raised.”
“We do recognise that the Union Territory of
Jammu and Kashmir has been plagued with militancy, which is required to be
taken into consideration. These competing considerations need to be calibrated
in terms of our judgment (on lockdown in J&K) in Anuradha Bhasin (case),”
it had said.
No comments:
Post a Comment